|
Planning to monitor results involves determining:
- Tools (e.g., performance indicators, evaluations, special studies) that
will be used to measure progress over time;
- Current situation (performance baseline) and the change in the situation
that will signal success (performance target);
- Data collection methods that will be used, the frequency of data collection
and the responsibility for data compilation and analysis or interpretation;
and
- How data will be used in the appropriate level of decision making,
resource allocation, and communicating the results.
|
1. Performance indicators and their definitions
Define each performance indicator carefully. Indicators may be either quantitative
or qualitative. When the activities or anticipated results are expected to
affect men and women differently and the gender difference is potentially
significant for managing toward sustainable impact, the SO Team must include
gender-sensitive indicators.
Be precise about all technical elements of the indicator statement. Consider
this indicator: the number of small enterprises receiving loans from the private
banking system. How are small enterprises defined -- all enterprises with
20 or fewer employees, or 50 or 100?
What types of institutions are considered part of the private banking sector
-- credit unions, government-private sector joint-venture financial institutions?
Include in the definition the unit of measurement. Provide enough detail
to ensure that different people at different times, given the task of collecting
data for a given indicator, will collect identical types of data. Consider
an indicator for the value of exports. Will the value be measured in current
or constant terms? In U.S. dollars or local currency?
2. Data source
Identify the data source for each performance indicator. Data sources may
include government departments, international organizations, other donors,
NGOs, private firms, USAID offices, contractors, or activity implementing
agencies. Be as specific about the source as possible, so that the same source
can be used routinely. This will ensure consistency and avoid misinterpretations.
Consider this: What will happen if a switch is made from estimates of infant
mortality rates based on national sample surveys to estimates based on hospital
registration statistics? It can lead to false impressions of change.
Plans may refer to needs and means for strengthening the capacity of a particular
data source to collect needed data on a regular basis, or for building special
data collection efforts into USAID activities.
3. Method of data collection
Specify the method or approach to data collection for each indicator. Provide
sufficient detail on the data collection or calculation method to enable it
to be replicated. To the extent possible, the data collected should be sex-disaggregated.
Consider the trade-offs between primary data collection and reliance on existing
secondary data.
- For primary data collection, consider:
- the unit of analysis (individuals, families, communities, clinics, wells);
- data disaggregation needs (by gender, age, ethnic groups, location);
- sampling techniques for selecting cases (random sampling, purposive sampling);
- and techniques or instruments for acquiring data on these selected cases,
such as structured questionnaires, direct observation forms, scales to weigh
infants).
For secondary data from existing sources, consider that quality may not be
as reliable as primary data cuts costs and efforts.
4. Frequency and schedule of data collection
Gather comparable data periodically to measure progress. How frequent the
collection should be depends on the data being gathered. For example, collect
fertility rate data from sample surveys every few years because of the expense
and because changes are slow; collect data on contraceptive distributions
and sales from clinics' or other outlets' record systems quarterly.
5. Responsibilities for acquiring data
Assign responsibility to a particular office, team or individual for the
timely acquisition of data from one or more sources for each performance indicator.
6. Data analysis plans
Good analytic tools are available. Over time, analysis can be more sophisticated.
- Plan the analysis of performance data for individual indicators or groups
of related indicators.
- Identify data analysis techniques and data presentation formats to be used.
- Disaggregated data (by gender, race, age, location, etc.)
- Comparison of actual performance data with:
- a) past performance,
- b) planned or targeted performance, or
- c) other relevant benchmarks.
- Analysis of relationships among performance indicators. For example: How
will a set of indicators (if there are more than one) for a particular Strategic
Objective (SO) or Intermediate Result (IR) be analyzed to reveal progress?
What if only some of the indicators reveal progress? How will cause-effect
relationships among SOs and IRs within a results framework be analyzed? How
will USAID activities be linked to achieving IRs and SOs?
7. Plans for complementary evaluations
Plan what evaluation efforts, if any, will be needed to complement information
from the performance monitoring system. If certain performance targets are
not being met, and if the reasons why are unclear, then plan an evaluation.
8. Plans for reporting, using, and sharing performance information
- Plan to use performance information to improve the performance, effectiveness,
and design of existing development assistance activities.
- Revise Agency or operating unit strategies where necessary.
- Plan new strategic objectives and/or activities.
- Inform decisions whether to abandon Agency program strategies, strategic
objectives or activities that are not achieving intended results.
- Document findings on the impact of development assistance.
- Plan what evaluation efforts, if any, will be needed to complement information
from the performance monitoring system.
- Plan, schedule, and assign responsibilities for internal and external reviews,
briefings, and reports.
- Clarify what, how and when management decisions will consider performance
information.
- Specifically, plan for the following:
- Operating unit performance reviews.
- Assess progress toward achieving SOs and IRs.
- Assess if activities' inputs, outputs, and processes are supporting
achievement of IRs and SOs.
- Help plan Annual Report preparation by scheduling tasks and making assignments.
- Plan for reporting and disseminating performance information to key
stakeholders, such as host government counterparts, collaborating NGOs,
other partners, donors, and customer groups. Use a combination of communication
techniques -- reports, oral briefings, videotapes, memos, and newspaper
articles.
- Understand which decision-making processes -- budget discussions, programming
decisions, evaluation designs/scopes of work, office retreats, management
contracts, and personnel appraisals -- benefit from performance information.
|