Skip to main contentAbout USAID Locations Our Work Public Affairs Careers Business / Policy
USAID: From The American People Policy Bringing Fresh Water to the People - Click to read this story
Home »
Management Discussion and Analysis »
Performance Section »
Financial Section »
Appendices »
   
Management Discussion and Analysis
Search



Mission and Values

MISSION

Create a more secure, democratic, and prosperous world for the benefit of the American people and the international community.

VALUES

Loyalty: Commitment to the United States and the American people.

Character: Maintenance of high ethical standards and integrity.

Service: Excellence in the formulation of policy and management practices with room for creative dissent. Implementation of policy and management practices, regardless of personal views.

Accountability: Responsibility for achieving United States foreign policy goals while meeting the highest performance standards.

Community: Dedication to teamwork, professionalism, and the customer perspective.

USAID History

On September 4, 1961, the U.S. Congress passed the Foreign Assistance Act, which reorganized the U.S. foreign assistance programs, including separating military and non-military aid. The Act mandated the creation of an agency to administer economic assistance programs, and on November 3, 1961, President John F. Kennedy established the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

USAID became the first U.S. foreign assistance organization whose primary emphasis was on long-range economic and social development assistance efforts. Freed from political and military functions that plagued its predecessor organizations, USAID was able to offer direct support to the developing nations of the world.

The Agency unified already existing U.S. aid efforts, combining the economic and technical assistance operations of the International Cooperation Agency, the loan activities of the Development Loan Fund, the local currency functions of the Export-Import Bank, and the agricultural surplus distribution activities of the Food for Peace program of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

While some could argue that the creation of USAID simply represented a bureaucratic reshuffling, the Agency, and the legislation creating it, represented a re-commitment to the very purposes of overseas development. USAID was established to unify assistance efforts, to provide a new focus on the needs of a changing world, and to assist other countries in maintaining their independence and become self-supporting.

U.S. Foreign Aid: Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century

Photo showing USAID Administrator Andrew Natsios speaking.

"We are revitalizing our cutting-edge technical leadership and reforming critical business operations. We have integrated our emergency, transition, and food operations into a single capacity to respond to failing states, complex crises, and postconflict reconstruction, and augmented it with a new conflict mitigation and management focus."

– Andrew S. Natsios, Administrator
U.S. Agency for International Development

The end of the Cold War and the new international challenges that now face the United States have prompted the most thorough reassessment of the country's development mission since the end of the Second World War. As part of this reassessment, USAID has embraced five core operational goals:

  • Supporting transformational development
  • Strengthening fragile states and reconstructing failed states
  • Supporting U.S. geo-strategic interests
  • Addressing transnational problems
  • Providing humanitarian relief in crisis countries

Each of these goals is vitally relevant to combating terrorism and strengthening U.S. security at home and abroad.

Supporting transformational development. In the developing world, USAID supports far-reaching, fundamental changes in institutions of governance; human services, such as health and education; and economic growth. Through this assistance, capacity is built for a country to sustain its own progress. While these efforts have long been justified in terms of U.S. generosity, they must now be understood as investments in a stable, secure, and interdependent world.

Strengthening fragile states and reconstructing failed states. The President's National Security Strategy wisely recognizes the growing global risks of failing states: "The events of September 11, 2001 taught us that weak states…can pose as great a danger to our national interests as strong states… poverty, weak institutions and corruption can make weak states vulnerable to terrorist networks and drug cartels within their borders." The failure of states such as Zaire, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Bosnia, Somalia, and Liberia had repercussions far beyond their own regions. The consequences are being dealt with today. There is perhaps no more urgent matter, no more difficult and intractable set of problems facing USAID's portfolio than that of fragile states.

Fragile states present a leading threat to U.S. national security in the 21st century; one clearly recognized in the 2002 National Security Strategy. Strengthening fragile states emerged as a discrete category among the five operational goals identified in USAID's White Paper, U.S. Foreign Aid: Meeting the Challenges of the Twenty-First Century. Although USAID has worked in fragile states for decades, it had treated them much the same as countries on a development path. The Agency recognized the need to do business differently in such environments for which it has formulated a new and separate strategy. Fragile states include those that are failing, failed, and recovering where conditions are not viable for long-term development. Hence, the purpose of USAID assistance in fragile states is to advance recovery to a point where development progress is possible. Stabilization efforts, support for reform, and capacity development are priorities in such environments. Basic security and strengthening essential institutions provide the cornerstones for recovery.

In order to assist fragile states more effectively:

  • USAID will establish an early warning system using sound criteria and thresholds and bolster its capacity to respond quickly. Need, vulnerability to instability, and conflict, as well as policy performance will be core to designating a state as fragile.
  • The Agency will analyze the nature and sources of fragility. USAID will analyze effectiveness and legitimacy along four key dimensions—security, political, economic, and social—and the motivations and objectives of key actors in order to understand the critical points of vulnerability. USAID assistance will target the sources of fragility, and where necessary, address the symptoms.
  • USAID will apply the principle of selectivity. Assistance will be directed to states based on foreign policy importance and the ability to contribute to constructive change.

Fragile states present an inherently risky challenge. The best analysis, skilled assistance personnel, and generous resources will not necessarily be able to pre-empt failure: the primary responsibility for that remains within the country itself. Moreover, among outside actors, USAID cannot meet the challenge of fragile states alone. The Agency has taken the lead by developing its Fragile States Strategy which now provides the foundation for a coherent U.S. government response. In addition, USAID, together with the Department for International Development (DFID) and the Low Income Countries Under Stress (LICUS) group at the World Bank, is actively promoting a concerted response with other donors and international actors to the challenge posed by fragile states based on its new strategy. Complementary engagement by national and international actors offers the greatest potential to arrest or mitigate a country's slide into failure.

Supporting U.S. geo-strategic interests. Aid is an important component of U.S. foreign assistance, while countries strive to win their own battles against terrorism. The tasks today are broader and more demanding than just winning the allegiance of key leaders around the world. For example, while it is vital that the U.S. government help keep a nuclear-armed Pakistan allied with the United States in the war on terrorism, the United States must also help Pakistanis move toward a more stable, prosperous, and democratic society. USAID's support for reform of Pakistan's educational system and political institutions is critical in this regard.

Addressing transnational problems. Global and transnational issues are those where progress depends on collective effort and cooperation among countries. Examples include HIV/AIDS and other infectious diseases, international trade agreements, and criminal activities such as trafficking in persons and narcotics. USAID will continue to play a leading role on these issues, assisting countries to address these problems that could otherwise bring danger and instability.

Providing humanitarian relief in crisis countries. The United States has always been a leader in humanitarian aid and disaster relief. The United States is the largest contributor of food aid that has fed the hungry and combated famine around the world. This is a moral imperative that has not changed. As an agency, USAID must, however, do a better job of combining such assistance with longer term development goals. And USAID must make sure that the recipients are aware of help and U.S. generosity. This is particularly important in areas of the world subjected to anti-Americanism and terrorist propaganda.

Photo showing USAID delivering aid to Pakistan.
USAID delivers aid to Pakistan. Photo: USAID/ANE

Back to Top ^ | < Previous Page | Next Page >

 

About USAID

Our Work

Locations

Public Affairs

Careers

Business/Policy

 Digg this page : Share this page on StumbleUpon : Post This Page to Del.icio.us : Save this page to Reddit : Save this page to Yahoo MyWeb : Share this page on Facebook : Save this page to Newsvine : Save this page to Google Bookmarks : Save this page to Mixx : Save this page to Technorati : USAID RSS Feeds Star