Independent Auditor's Report – USAID's Accruals Reporting System Needs Improvement
Summary: USAID's Accruals Reporting System produced erroneous information that
limited the ability of Cognizant Technical Officers (CTOs) to accurately reflect their
estimates of accrued expenditures and accounts payable in USAID's accounting
records. In our testing of the Accruals Reporting System in Washington, DC, the OIG
determined that it did not correctly compute unliquidated obligation information, and
used this incorrect information as an upper limit for accrual estimates. This occurred
because USAID's Accruals Reporting System was not correctly programmed to calculate
unliquidated obligations based on the amounts obligated and amounts vouchered. As a
result, USAID's accrued expenditures and accounts payable were recorded inaccurately
and USAID was required to record $440 million in upward adjustments. The OIG
recommended an additional $131 million in downward adjustments based on the
projected errors in accrual calculations by CTOs in Washington. The OIG did note
improvements in the accrual methodologies used by CTOs in USAID's overseas
missions during FY 2005.
OMB's Core Financial System Requirements stipulate that an agency's core financial
system must be able to provide timely and useful financial information to support:
management's fiduciary role; budget formulation and execution functions; fiscal
management of program delivery and program decision making and; internal and
external reporting requirements. External reporting requirements include the
requirements for financial statements prepared in accordance with the form and content
prescribed by OMB, reporting requirements prescribed by Treasury, and legal,
regulatory and other special management requirements of the agency. The core
financial system must provide complete, reliable, consistent, timely and useful financial
management information on operations.
According to USAID's Automated Directives System (ADS) 631, financial documentation
represents any documentation that impacts on or results in financial activity. It is not
limited to documentation within the financial management operations but includes any
source material resulting in a financial transaction. CTOs, Loan Officers, Grants
Officers, Strategic Objective teams, and others are responsible for retaining financial
documentation and ensuring its availability for audit. ADS 631 states that these
individuals must gather cost data—such as supporting project documentation, activity
reports, delivery reports, or fixed reoccurring expenses—for the accruals exercise and
then compare the data to payment histories and advances to estimate quarterly
accruals.
At USAID, accrued expenditures are accounting estimates of services or goods
rendered which have not yet been paid. In conducting quarterly accrual estimates,
USAID relied on a combination of its automated Accruals Reporting System and the
efforts of its CTOs at overseas missions and in Washington, DC. The OIG found that
amounts accrued via accrual worksheets prepared by CTOs sometimes lacked sufficient
documentation to support accrual estimates and that such documentation could often
not be produced subsequent to the recording of the estimates.
The larger problem, however, was that USAID's Accruals Reporting System did not
always correctly compute unliquidated obligation information resulting in many instances
of under-estimation of accrual information. The system is designed to generate a logical
estimate of quarterly contract and grant expenditures that can be modified by CTOs who
have more direct information on the quarterly activity of contractors and grantees.
However, both the system estimate and the modified CTOs calculations were ignored by
the system when the unliquidated amount contained in the system was lower. This
lower unliquidated amount was ultimately posted to USAID's accounting records. The
OIG noted various instances where this occurred and determined that the default to a
lower unliquidated amount reduced accounts payable and accrued expenditures by as
much as $440 million. Once presented with this information, USAID identified a
programming error that it corrected within hours of its discovery. Based on the OIG
discovery, USAID made a $440 million adjustment to more accurately present accrued
expenditures and accounts payable for year-end financial reporting.
With respect to CTO estimates, we found accrual documentation
errors, including incorrect calculations, misinterpretation
of grantee information, and incorrect comparisons of estimated
expenditure reports. Based on the projected errors of accruals
estimated by CTOs in Washington, the OIG recommended an additional
$131 million in adjustments to more accurately reflect accounts
payable and accrued expenditures. These errors occurred more
frequently within USAID's three pillar which are responsible
for 90 percent of all accrual estimates in Washington, DC,
as the table below illustrates:
Accrual Estimates by USAID Pillar Burea
| USAID Pillar Bureau |
Percentage of All Washington
Accrual Estimates from the
Accruals Reporting System
(2005 4th Quarter) |
| Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance (DCHA) |
64% |
| Global Health (GH) |
14% |
| Economic Growth, Agriculture and Trade (EGAT) |
12% |
| All Other Washington Offices |
10% |
| Total |
100% |
In response to a previous OIG recommendation, USAID has worked with the contractor
maintaining its core accounting system (Phoenix) to improve the quality of CTO
information, allowing the OIG to more easily locate the USAID managers responsible for
maintaining accrual estimates and to perform a more complete analysis of the accrual
information. In addition, USAID hired a contractor to train its CTO and, as a result, 471
CTOs were trained in Washington, DC during 2005. USAID should continue its
commitment to train its CTOs.
To address the deficiencies of the Accruals Reporting System, the OIG is making the
following recommendation.
Recommendation 1: We recommend that USAID's Office of the Chief Financial
Officer modify USAID's interface between the Accruals Reporting System and the
USAID accounting system general ledger so that it correctly calculates and posts
accrual information and that it establishes a review mechanism in the Accruals
Reporting System to review accrual information for propriety before it is posted to the
general ledger.
Back to Top ^ | < Previous Page | Next Page >
|