Skip to main contentAbout USAID Locations Our Work Public Affairs Careers Business / Policy
USAID: From The American People Office of Food for Peace Improving Mobility for the Disabled - Click to read this story

About Food for Peace »
Activities»
History»
Partners »
Programs»
Resources »
Technical Sectors»
Where We Work»


One of several communities in Southwest Bangladesh affected by severe flooding.
What's New
 
Search



LOW-INCOME FOOD-DEFICIT COUNTRIES (LIFDC)

This page lists the Low-Income Food-Deficit Countries (LIFDC) as of March 2008. The list stands at 82 countries.

Africa Asia Europe
Angola Afghanistan Albania
Benin Armenia Belarus
Burkina Faso Azerbaijan Bosnia and Herzegovina
Burundi Bangladesh Moldova
Cameroon Bhutan  
Cape Verde Cambodia  
Central African Rep.China  
Chad Democratic People's Republic of Korea
America
ComorosGeorgiaHaiti
Congo IndiaHonduras
Côte d'Ivoire Indonesia Nicaragua
Democratic Republic of the Congo Iraq 
Djibouti Kyrgyzstan
Oceania
Egypt Laos People's Democratic Republic Kiribati
Equatorial Guinea Mongolia Papua New Guinea
Eritrea Nepal Solomon Islands
Ethiopia Pakistan Tonga
Gambia Philippines Tuvalu
Ghana Sri Lanka Vanuatu
Guinea Syrian Arab Republic  
Guinea-Bissau Tajikistan  
Kenya Timor-Leste  
Lesotho Turkmenistan  
Liberia Uzbekistan  
Madagascar Yemen  
Malawi    
Mali    
Mauritania    
Morocco    
Mozambique    
Niger    
Nigeria    
Rwanda    
Sao Tome & Principe    
Senegal    
Sierra Leone    
Somalia    
Sudan    
Swaziland    
Togo    
Uganda    
United Republic of Tanzania    
Zambia    
Zimbabwe    

Classification:

The classification of a country as low-income food-deficit (LIFDC) used for analytical purposes by FAO is traditionally determined by three criteria. First, a country should have a per capita income below the "historical" ceiling used by the World Bank to determine eligibility for IDA assistance and for 20-year IBRD terms, applied to countries included in World Bank categories I and II. The historical ceiling of per capita GNP for 2004,based on the World Bank Atlas method, is US$1 575. The second criterion is based on the net (i.e. gross imports less gross exports) food trade position of a country averaged over the preceding three years, i.e. from 2001 to 2003. Trade volumes for a broad basket of basic foodstuffs (cereals, roots and tubers, pulses, oilseeds and oils other than tree crop oils, meat and dairy products) are converted and aggregated by the calorie content of individual commodities. Thirdly the self-exclusion criterion is applied when countries that meet the above two criteria specifically request to be excluded from the LIFDC category. In order to avoid countries changing their LIFDC status too frequently - typically reflecting short-term, exogenous shocks - an additional factor is taken into consideration from this year. This consideration, called "persistence of position", would postpone the "exit" of a LIFDC from the list, despite the country not meeting the LIFDC income criterion or the food-deficit criterion, until the change in its status is verified for three consecutive years. In other words, a country is taken off the list in the fourth year, after confirming a sustained improvement in its position for three consecutive years. During these three years, the country in question would be considered to be in a "transitional" phase.

Back to Top ^

 

About USAID

Our Work

Locations

Public Affairs

Careers

Business/Policy

 Digg this page : Share this page on StumbleUpon : Post This Page to Del.icio.us : Save this page to Reddit : Save this page to Yahoo MyWeb : Share this page on Facebook : Save this page to Newsvine : Save this page to Google Bookmarks : Save this page to Mixx : Save this page to Technorati : USAID RSS Feeds Star