About USAID Our Work Locations Policy Press Business Careers USAID Seal - Link to Home Page
 

Innovations, failures and the crisis in humanitarian aid

  
  Acknowledgements

Foreword

Overview: Promoting Freedom, Security and Opportunity

Chapter 1: Promoting Democratic Governance

Chapter 2: Driving Economic Growth

Chapter 3: Improving People's Health

Chapter 4: Mitigating and Managing Conflict

Chapter 5: Providing Humanitarian Aid

Chapter 6: The Full Measure of Foreign Aid

Tuesday, 07-Jan-2003 08:51:22 EST

 
  

Jump to Chapter 5 Sections:
>> Humanitarian aid in the 1990's >> New humanitarian actors >> Innovations, failures and the crisis in humanitarian aid >> Evolving practices and future changes >> Looking ahead >> Background paper >> References



Initiated in 1989, Operation Lifeline Sudan was the first UN access agreement negotiated with both a government and a rebel movement to ensure lifesaving assistance in the midst of a war. Negotiated access agreements have become a basic model for delivering aid in conflict settings, and have been used in countries such as Angola, Ethiopia, and Mozambique. In a variation on the theme, the United Nations has also negotiated "days of tranquility" and "humanitarian cease-fires" to deliver lifesaving aid.

In Bosnia, eastern Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of Congo), and northern Iraq logistics operations reached new heights. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees described its humanitarian operations in Bosnia as unprecedented in "scale, scope and complexity." They included the Sarajevo airlift, the longest running humanitarian airlift ever-surpassing even the 1948-49 airlift in Berlin. Civilian-military collaboration allowed for impressive new logistical feats as well as new security models. The idea of safe havens was born, where protection and assistance are provided within a war-affected country.

Despite (and perhaps partly because of) these innovations, by the mid-1990s humanitarian aid was widely considered to be in a state of conceptual crisis. As political analyst William DeMars has observed, "In the modern history of humanitarian action dating from civilian relief during the Second World War, never before has the legitimacy of the enterprise been so profoundly and publicly challenged, while at the same time never have the services of humanitarian organizations been more in demand." Why?

Possible negative effects of assistance



Part of the answer lies in the unintended negative aspects of relief, so evident during the 1990s and now well documented. Operation Lifeline Sudan is a case in point. This remarkable structure has averted and reduced famine in Sudan for more than a dozen years-but it is also thought to have prolonged the conflict. Warring parties, especially the government, deny access to some locations, and all sides use aid to finance the war. Military forces use days of tranquility and humanitarian ceasefires to regroup for the next round of fighting. In addition, aid supports belligerents who impose "taxes" or steal to obtain relief assets; makes civilians targets for militias that strip them of their assets; empowers belligerents by allowing them to control civilian access to resources; and absolves ruling parties from their welfare responsibilities by meeting local needs. Finally, introducing relief supplies into a resource-scarce environment may dramatically fuel a war economy in which many have a continuing, vested interest.

Development economist Mary Anderson describes two kinds of negative aid impacts: tangible ones related to resource transfers that empower belligerents and reinforce a war economy, and intangible ones that convey unintended messages. Negotiating access, for example, unwittingly elevates the status of armed groups and confers legitimacy on conflict.

page 2

Star