About USAID Our Work Locations Policy Press Business Careers USAID Seal - Link to Home Page
 

New Humanitarian Actors

  
  Acknowledgements

Foreword

Overview: Promoting Freedom, Security and Opportunity

Chapter 1: Promoting Democratic Governance

Chapter 2: Driving Economic Growth

Chapter 3: Improving People's Health

Chapter 4: Mitigating and Managing Conflict

Chapter 5: Providing Humanitarian Aid

Chapter 6: The Full Measure of Foreign Aid

Tuesday, 07-Jan-2003 08:51:11 EST

 
  

Jump to Chapter 5 Sections:
>> Humanitarian aid in the 1990's >> New humanitarian actors >> Innovations, failures and the crisis in humanitarian aid >> Evolving practices and future changes >> Looking ahead >> Background paper >> References



Lacking support from superpowers, armed groups have turned to exploiting the natural resources around them and stripping civilian assets to finance their operations.

Killing, injuring, and kidnapping aid workers is also part of the new war scenario, as are child soldiers and gender-specific atrocities (raping women, executing men). This brutality is facilitated by the greater availability and low cost of a wide variety of weapons.

The 1990s saw not only vast human suffering generated by new wars and other global threats, but also a greater interest in addressing them on humanitarian, human rights, and security grounds. Humanitarian actors had new opportunities to intervene their mission to save lives and reduce human suffering merging with the larger security interests of the international community, at times making them an element of larger political and military strategies.

Complex emergencies, complex responses



Humanitarian relief workers often refer to conflict settings as complex humanitarian emergencies, defined as internal conflicts with large-scale displacement of people; fragile or failing political, economic and social institutions; random and systematic violence against non-combatants; infrastructure collapse, widespread lawlessness and interrupted food production and trade. This term reflects the human suffering caused by these conflicts though the emergencies are, at heart, political, with real solutions lying outside the humanitarian realm.

The complexity has as much to do with the nature of responses as with the intricacies of con- flicts. Responses in war settings were once the responsibility of the International Committee of the Red Cross, as the custodian of the 1949 Geneva Convention and 1977 Additional Protocols. But today UN agencies, NGOs, and a range of military actors are on the scene. The relationships within and between these entities differ in each case, and coordination among them has become more difficult with the growing number and type of actors.

page 2

Star