About USAID Our Work Locations Policy Press Business Careers USAID Seal - Link to Home Page
 

Evolving practices and future changes

  
  Acknowledgements

Foreword

Overview: Promoting Freedom, Security and Opportunity

Chapter 1: Promoting Democratic Governance

Chapter 2: Driving Economic Growth

Chapter 3: Improving People's Health

Chapter 4: Mitigating and Managing Conflict

Chapter 5: Providing Humanitarian Aid

Chapter 6: The Full Measure of Foreign Aid

Tuesday, 07-Jan-2003 08:51:05 EST

 
  

Jump to Chapter 5 Sections:
>> Humanitarian aid in the 1990's >> New humanitarian actors >> Innovations, failures and the crisis in humanitarian aid >> Evolving practices and future changes >> Looking ahead >> Background paper >> References



The code of conduct and the Sphere Project documents refer clearly to the rights of people affected by conflicts and disasters and reflect a shift in the philosophy of many aid organizations: assistance and protection are now seen as rights due, not privileges granted. From this perspective, countries and the international aid community must be held accountable not just for but actually to crisis-affected populations. Two recent initiatives, the Humanitarian Ombudsmen Project and the Humanitarian Accountability Project, take the rights of aid recipients to new levels. Both seek to create accountability mechanisms that empower humanitarian "claimants" and give them greater say in the aid process.

A recent, deeply disturbing report by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and Save the Children UK on sexual violence and exploitation of refugee children in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone makes clear the ease with which personnel of powerful relief organizations can prey on the populations they are intended to assist and highlights the importance of making aid agencies more accountable to aid recipients. Aid organizations need to make explicit to their workers how principles must be embraced and translate them into organizational policies, operational guidelines, and rules of behavior. Better assessment and monitoring will necessarily follow. Absent an independent body with the authority to determine compliance with principles or minimum standards and to impose sanctions, new and more rigorous selfpolicing will be required. Donor agencies that control substantial funding flows have an ethical duty to insist on high standards, whatever the attempts at self-regulatory codes.

Improving protection for civilians caught in conflicts



This new code of conduct is just one component of the international community’s search for better protection measures for refugees, internally displaced persons, and other civilians affected by conflicts. The UN Millennium Declaration’s pledge to "strengthen the protection of civilians in complex emergencies" is playing out in many ways. Proposals for rapid deployment forces to thwart violence against civilians, peacekeeping operations with more robust civilian protection components, greater use of international, regional, and local police forces, and engagement of private security firms to protect civilians are outgrowths of past protection failures. And the creation of war crimes tribunals for Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia and the ratification of the Rome Statute for an International Criminal Court reflect determined efforts to punish those who violate internationally recognized standards of protection.

page 3

Star